Tulsa, OK vs Fort Worth, TX
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Fort Worth, TX outspends Tulsa, OK by a wide margin per resident — $15,939 versus $5,250, a 204% difference. A gap this size usually reflects a structurally different service mix or accounting scope rather than a single line item.
Fort Worth, TX edges Tulsa, OK on the Fiscal Health Score by 7 points — 63/100 (grade C) to 56/100 (grade C). At a margin this narrow the grade is close enough that the factor-level detail matters more than the composite.
Tulsa, OK reports no outstanding debt per resident in its Census filing, while Fort Worth, TX carries $1,921 per resident. Their budgets diverge on where the largest per-resident dollars go: Tulsa, OK leads with health at $762 per resident, while Fort Worth, TX leads with parks and recreation at $708.
Summary
Fort Worth spends 67.1% more per capita than Tulsa ($10,689/person difference). Fort Worth, TX has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (C, 63/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Sales Tax | $97 | $198 |
| Income Tax | $0 | $851 |
| Intergovernmental | $0 | $4,002 |
| Charges & Fees | $0 | $3,594 |
| Other | $53 | $3,439 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Police | $628 | $0 |
| Fire Protection | $196 | $156 |
| Highways & Roads | $257 | $317 |
| Public Welfare | $86 | $869 |
| Health | $762 | $235 |
| Hospitals | $0 | $1,680 |
| Parks & Recreation | $154 | $708 |
| Housing | $350 | $4,217 |
| Sewerage | $27 | $267 |
| Utilities | $41 | $2,674 |
| Other | $2,748 | $4,817 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.