Tulsa, OK vs Edmond, OK
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Edmond, OK outspends Tulsa, OK by a wide margin per resident — $13,890 versus $5,250, a 165% difference. A gap this size usually reflects a structurally different service mix or accounting scope rather than a single line item.
Edmond, OK holds the stronger Fiscal Health Score, 89/100 (grade A) against 56/100 (grade C) for Tulsa, OK — a 33-point spread that puts the two in different grade territory.
Tulsa, OK reports no outstanding debt per resident in its Census filing, while Edmond, OK carries $32 per resident. Their budgets diverge on where the largest per-resident dollars go: Tulsa, OK leads with health at $762 per resident, while Edmond, OK leads with parks and recreation at $1,270.
Summary
Edmond spends 62.2% more per capita than Tulsa ($8,640/person difference). Edmond, OK has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (A, 89/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Sales Tax | $97 | $197 |
| Income Tax | $0 | $1,194 |
| Intergovernmental | $0 | $11,725 |
| Charges & Fees | $0 | $4,504 |
| Other | $53 | $3,803 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Police | $628 | $0 |
| Fire Protection | $196 | $0 |
| Highways & Roads | $257 | $0 |
| Education | $0 | $51 |
| Public Welfare | $86 | $839 |
| Health | $762 | $0 |
| Hospitals | $0 | $73 |
| Parks & Recreation | $154 | $1,270 |
| Housing | $350 | $3,733 |
| Sewerage | $27 | $0 |
| Utilities | $41 | $2,768 |
| Interest on Debt | $0 | $247 |
| Other | $2,748 | $4,908 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.