Tulsa, OK vs Arlington, TX
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Arlington, TX outspends Tulsa, OK by a wide margin per resident — $11,769 versus $5,250, a 124% difference. A gap this size usually reflects a structurally different service mix or accounting scope rather than a single line item.
Arlington, TX holds the stronger Fiscal Health Score, 83/100 (grade A) against 56/100 (grade C) for Tulsa, OK — a 27-point spread that puts the two in different grade territory.
Tulsa, OK reports no outstanding debt per resident in its Census filing, while Arlington, TX carries $594 per resident. Their budgets diverge on where the largest per-resident dollars go: Tulsa, OK leads with health at $762 per resident, while Arlington, TX leads with parks and recreation at $1,352.
Summary
Arlington spends 55.4% more per capita than Tulsa ($6,519/person difference). Arlington, TX has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (A, 83/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Sales Tax | $97 | $507 |
| Income Tax | $0 | $73 |
| Intergovernmental | $0 | $25,062 |
| Charges & Fees | $0 | $2,949 |
| Other | $53 | $3,897 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Police | $628 | $0 |
| Fire Protection | $196 | $160 |
| Highways & Roads | $257 | $149 |
| Public Welfare | $86 | $826 |
| Health | $762 | $219 |
| Hospitals | $0 | $152 |
| Parks & Recreation | $154 | $1,352 |
| Housing | $350 | $2,981 |
| Sewerage | $27 | $141 |
| Utilities | $41 | $1,385 |
| Other | $2,748 | $4,404 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.