Tucson, AZ vs Portland, OR
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Portland, OR spends 50% more per resident than Tucson, AZ: $23,675 against $15,759. That gap is large enough to show up across most functional budget categories below.
Portland, OR holds the stronger Fiscal Health Score, 63/100 (grade C) against 55/100 (grade C) for Tucson, AZ — a 8-point spread that puts the two in different grade territory.
On debt, Tucson, AZ carries the lighter load at $1,540 per resident versus $1,574 for Portland, OR. Both cities pour the most per-resident dollars into the same function: parks and recreation leads in Tucson, AZ at $1,229 per resident and in Portland, OR at $2,477.
On the revenue side both lean hardest on intergovernmental transfers — 100% of total revenue in Tucson, AZ and 19% in Portland, OR.
Summary
Portland spends 33.4% more per capita than Tucson ($7,916/person difference). Portland, OR has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (C, 63/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Property Tax | $5 | $0 |
| Sales Tax | $309 | $1,695 |
| Income Tax | $1,107 | $130 |
| Intergovernmental | $23,276 | $8,979 |
| Charges & Fees | $4,534 | $3,883 |
| Other | $952 | $7,916 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Fire Protection | $330 | $1,700 |
| Highways & Roads | $0 | $139 |
| Public Welfare | $1,181 | $3,607 |
| Hospitals | $1,314 | $2,893 |
| Parks & Recreation | $1,229 | $2,477 |
| Housing | $3,091 | $3,694 |
| Sewerage | $0 | $630 |
| Utilities | $3,555 | $1,845 |
| Interest on Debt | $1,735 | $0 |
| Other | $3,322 | $6,689 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.