Tucson, AZ vs Philadelphia, PA
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Philadelphia, PA outspends Tucson, AZ by a wide margin per resident — $56,272 versus $15,759, a 257% difference. A gap this size usually reflects a structurally different service mix or accounting scope rather than a single line item.
Tucson, AZ holds the stronger Fiscal Health Score, 55/100 (grade C) against 45/100 (grade D) for Philadelphia, PA — a 10-point spread that puts the two in different grade territory.
On debt, Philadelphia, PA carries the lighter load at $1,069 per resident versus $1,540 for Tucson, AZ. Their budgets diverge on where the largest per-resident dollars go: Tucson, AZ leads with parks and recreation at $1,229 per resident, while Philadelphia, PA leads with fire protection at $7,082.
On the revenue side both lean hardest on intergovernmental transfers — 100% of total revenue in Tucson, AZ and 16% in Philadelphia, PA.
Summary
Philadelphia spends 72.0% more per capita than Tucson ($40,513/person difference). Tucson, AZ has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (C, 55/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Property Tax | $5 | $0 |
| Sales Tax | $309 | $107 |
| Income Tax | $1,107 | $8 |
| Intergovernmental | $23,276 | $6,288 |
| Charges & Fees | $4,534 | $2,790 |
| Other | $952 | $4,029 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Police | $0 | $1,505 |
| Fire Protection | $330 | $7,082 |
| Highways & Roads | $0 | $1,215 |
| Public Welfare | $1,181 | $1,456 |
| Health | $0 | $229 |
| Hospitals | $1,314 | $4,048 |
| Parks & Recreation | $1,229 | $593 |
| Housing | $3,091 | $4,902 |
| Sewerage | $0 | $325 |
| Utilities | $3,555 | $4,222 |
| Interest on Debt | $1,735 | $3 |
| Other | $3,322 | $30,692 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.