Topeka, KS vs Wichita, KS
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Topeka, KS outspends Wichita, KS by a wide margin per resident — $14,435 versus $7,986, a 81% difference. A gap this size usually reflects a structurally different service mix or accounting scope rather than a single line item.
Wichita, KS edges Topeka, KS on the Fiscal Health Score by 3 points — 90/100 (grade A) to 87/100 (grade A). At a margin this narrow the grade is close enough that the factor-level detail matters more than the composite.
On debt, Topeka, KS carries the lighter load at $30 per resident versus $132 for Wichita, KS. Their budgets diverge on where the largest per-resident dollars go: Topeka, KS leads with highways and roads at $353 per resident, while Wichita, KS leads with parks and recreation at $874.
They also fund themselves differently: charges and fees is the largest single revenue source in Topeka, KS at 19% of total revenue, whereas Wichita, KS relies most on intergovernmental transfers at 14%.
Summary
Topeka spends 80.8% more per capita than Wichita ($6,449/person difference). Wichita, KS has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (A, 90/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Property Tax | $823 | $0 |
| Sales Tax | $182 | $246 |
| Income Tax | $0 | $57 |
| Intergovernmental | $3,030 | $3,895 |
| Charges & Fees | $6,883 | $3,193 |
| Other | $4,080 | $2,783 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Fire Protection | $190 | $152 |
| Highways & Roads | $353 | $126 |
| Education | $0 | $2 |
| Public Welfare | $3,253 | $441 |
| Health | $0 | $254 |
| Hospitals | $0 | $113 |
| Parks & Recreation | $55 | $874 |
| Housing | $3,032 | $2,618 |
| Utilities | $3,548 | $1,225 |
| Interest on Debt | $663 | $70 |
| Other | $3,342 | $2,111 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.