Toms River, NJ vs Paterson, NJ
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Paterson, NJ outspends Toms River, NJ by a wide margin per resident — $16,110 versus $9,931, a 62% difference. A gap this size usually reflects a structurally different service mix or accounting scope rather than a single line item.
Toms River, NJ holds the stronger Fiscal Health Score, 90/100 (grade A) against 64/100 (grade C) for Paterson, NJ — a 26-point spread that puts the two in different grade territory.
Neither city reports outstanding debt per resident in its current Census filing, which removes debt service as a point of difference between them. Both cities pour the most per-resident dollars into the same function: parks and recreation leads in Toms River, NJ at $606 per resident and in Paterson, NJ at $349.
On the revenue side both lean hardest on intergovernmental transfers — 30% of total revenue in Toms River, NJ and 100% in Paterson, NJ.
Summary
Paterson spends 38.4% more per capita than Toms River ($6,179/person difference). Toms River, NJ has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (A, 90/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Property Tax | $2 | $17 |
| Sales Tax | $439 | $450 |
| Income Tax | $26 | $0 |
| Intergovernmental | $3,838 | $6,517 |
| Other | $2,872 | $1,614 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Fire Protection | $277 | $142 |
| Highways & Roads | $0 | $168 |
| Public Welfare | $324 | $294 |
| Health | $0 | $138 |
| Hospitals | $0 | $2,937 |
| Parks & Recreation | $606 | $349 |
| Housing | $2,899 | $2,861 |
| Sewerage | $363 | $1 |
| Utilities | $1,122 | $71 |
| Other | $4,339 | $9,148 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.