Toms River, NJ vs Elizabeth, NJ
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Elizabeth, NJ outspends Toms River, NJ by a wide margin per resident — $21,067 versus $9,931, a 112% difference. A gap this size usually reflects a structurally different service mix or accounting scope rather than a single line item.
Toms River, NJ holds the stronger Fiscal Health Score, 90/100 (grade A) against 61/100 (grade C) for Elizabeth, NJ — a 29-point spread that puts the two in different grade territory.
Neither city reports outstanding debt per resident in its current Census filing, which removes debt service as a point of difference between them. Both cities pour the most per-resident dollars into the same function: parks and recreation leads in Toms River, NJ at $606 per resident and in Elizabeth, NJ at $980.
They also fund themselves differently: intergovernmental transfers is the largest single revenue source in Toms River, NJ at 30% of total revenue, whereas Elizabeth, NJ relies most on charges and fees at 18%.
Summary
Elizabeth spends 52.9% more per capita than Toms River ($11,136/person difference). Toms River, NJ has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (A, 90/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Property Tax | $2 | $0 |
| Sales Tax | $439 | $528 |
| Income Tax | $26 | $24 |
| Intergovernmental | $3,838 | $1,021 |
| Charges & Fees | $0 | $2,319 |
| Other | $2,872 | $0 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Fire Protection | $277 | $437 |
| Highways & Roads | $0 | $599 |
| Public Welfare | $324 | $225 |
| Health | $0 | $332 |
| Hospitals | $0 | $3,386 |
| Parks & Recreation | $606 | $980 |
| Housing | $2,899 | $3,768 |
| Sewerage | $363 | $178 |
| Utilities | $1,122 | $928 |
| Other | $4,339 | $10,234 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.