Toledo, OH vs Akron, OH
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Akron, OH outspends Toledo, OH by a wide margin per resident — $19,638 versus $5,129, a 283% difference. A gap this size usually reflects a structurally different service mix or accounting scope rather than a single line item.
Akron, OH holds the stronger Fiscal Health Score, 73/100 (grade B) against 55/100 (grade C) for Toledo, OH — a 18-point spread that puts the two in different grade territory.
Neither city reports outstanding debt per resident in its current Census filing, which removes debt service as a point of difference between them. Their budgets diverge on where the largest per-resident dollars go: Toledo, OH leads with parks and recreation at $306 per resident, while Akron, OH leads with fire protection at $922.
They also fund themselves differently: other revenue is the largest single revenue source in Toledo, OH at 22847% of total revenue, whereas Akron, OH relies most on intergovernmental transfers at 100%.
Summary
Akron spends 73.9% more per capita than Toledo ($14,509/person difference). Akron, OH has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (B, 73/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Sales Tax | $142 | $148 |
| Intergovernmental | $9 | $23,016 |
| Charges & Fees | $3,379 | $1,806 |
| Other | $9,201 | $6,798 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Fire Protection | $0 | $922 |
| Hospitals | $1,874 | $4,350 |
| Parks & Recreation | $306 | $689 |
| Housing | $0 | $3,898 |
| Sewerage | $117 | $8 |
| Utilities | $1,283 | $3,689 |
| Other | $1,550 | $6,081 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.