Skip to main content
Data from U.S. Census Bureau · 2026 · Methodology
CitySpend

Thornton, CO vs Westminster, CO

Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)

Summary

Westminster spends 12.0% more per capita than Thornton ($1,972/person difference). Westminster, CO has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (C, 62/100).

Fiscal Health Score

City A
Thornton, CO
Pop. 141,799
C
54/100
Budget Balance78
Debt Burden3
Pension Funding76
Spending Efficiency94
Revenue Diversity0
Trend Direction50
City B
Westminster, CO
Pop. 115,502
C
62/100
Budget Balance68
Debt Burden13
Pension Funding76
Spending Efficiency83
Revenue Diversity100
Trend Direction50

Key Metrics

Metric
Thornton
Westminster
Total Spending
$2.1B
$1.9B
Spending / Capita
$14,462
$16,434
Total Revenue
$2.5B
$3.2B
Revenue / Capita
$17,658
$27,812
Total Debt
$173.1M
$131.4M
Debt / Capita
$1,221
$1,137
Population
141,799
115,502
Gov Employees / 10K
0.0
0.0
Avg Gov Salary
$0
$0

Per Capita Spending by Department

Fire Protection
Thornton$427
Westminster$302
Highways & Roads
Thornton$411
Westminster$297
Parks & Recreation
Thornton$1,969
Westminster$2,000
Health
Thornton$0
Westminster$335

Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)

ThorntonWestminster
Sales Tax
$530
$1,178
Income Tax
$420
$0
Intergovernmental
$17,658
$2,709
Charges & Fees
$4,216
$4,287
Other
$1,541
$3,595

Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)

ThorntonWestminster
Fire Protection
$427
$302
Highways & Roads
$411
$297
Public Welfare
$899
$964
Health
$0
$335
Hospitals
$173
$1,115
Parks & Recreation
$1,969
$2,000
Housing
$3,363
$3,232
Sewerage
$159
$0
Utilities
$3,118
$1,475
Other
$3,943
$6,713
C
Thornton, CO
Fiscal Health Score: 54/100
Average fiscal health
C
Westminster, CO
Fiscal Health Score: 62/100
Average fiscal health

Compare More Cities