Tacoma, WA vs Vancouver, WA
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Summary
Tacoma spends 77.9% more per capita than Vancouver ($10,461/person difference). Tacoma, WA has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (C, 61/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Property Tax | $131 | $31 |
| Sales Tax | $789 | $456 |
| Income Tax | $3,984 | $140 |
| Intergovernmental | $17,186 | $141 |
| Charges & Fees | $5,236 | $2,641 |
| Other | $6,696 | $6,500 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Fire Protection | $1,153 | $0 |
| Education | $1,396 | $3 |
| Public Welfare | $1,807 | $968 |
| Health | $283 | $0 |
| Hospitals | $396 | $661 |
| Parks & Recreation | $1,048 | $871 |
| Housing | $4,805 | $3,594 |
| Sewerage | $798 | $241 |
| Utilities | $5,418 | $2,481 |
| Other | $6,793 | $4,615 |
Compare More Cities
The side-by-side above pulls the the Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances data for both entity A and entity B. What follows is the interpretation — which specific axes carry the most weight for entity A versus entity B, and which differences are large enough to influence a real decision.
Practical use of the comparison: read the data above, then drill into the individual entity A and entity B detail pages for the underlying breakdown. A pairwise comparison answers the relative question; the per-entity pages answer the absolute question.
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.