St. Peters, MO vs Kansas City, MO
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Kansas City, MO outspends St. Peters, MO by a wide margin per resident — $22,820 versus $11,485, a 99% difference. A gap this size usually reflects a structurally different service mix or accounting scope rather than a single line item.
St. Peters, MO edges Kansas City, MO on the Fiscal Health Score by 7 points — 59/100 (grade C) to 52/100 (grade C). At a margin this narrow the grade is close enough that the factor-level detail matters more than the composite.
Kansas City, MO reports no outstanding debt per resident in its Census filing, while St. Peters, MO carries $71 per resident. Both cities pour the most per-resident dollars into the same function: parks and recreation leads in St. Peters, MO at $2,314 per resident and in Kansas City, MO at $1,309.
They also fund themselves differently: intergovernmental transfers is the largest single revenue source in St. Peters, MO at 100% of total revenue, whereas Kansas City, MO relies most on other revenue at 835%.
Summary
Kansas City spends 49.7% more per capita than St. Peters ($11,335/person difference). St. Peters, MO has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (C, 59/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Sales Tax | $1,412 | $623 |
| Income Tax | $2,724 | $0 |
| Intergovernmental | $9,257 | $7 |
| Charges & Fees | $1,242 | $3,794 |
| Other | $1,181 | $11,150 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Fire Protection | $783 | $119 |
| Highways & Roads | $167 | $0 |
| Public Welfare | $2,051 | $3,018 |
| Hospitals | $0 | $1,849 |
| Parks & Recreation | $2,314 | $1,309 |
| Housing | $2,637 | $4,681 |
| Utilities | $2,793 | $3,123 |
| Other | $739 | $8,721 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.