Springfield, MA vs New Bedford, MA
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Summary
Springfield spends 33.3% more per capita than New Bedford ($16,411/person difference). New Bedford, MA has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (D, 49/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Sales Tax | $34 | $123 |
| Income Tax | $0 | $5 |
| Intergovernmental | $15,275 | $7,480 |
| Charges & Fees | $0 | $1,982 |
| Other | $770 | $4,106 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Fire Protection | $829 | $252 |
| Highways & Roads | $308 | $886 |
| Education | $47,090 | $31,923 |
| Public Welfare | $640 | $708 |
| Health | $453 | $255 |
| Hospitals | $861 | $610 |
| Parks & Recreation | $673 | $315 |
| Housing | $3,784 | $2,315 |
| Sewerage | $282 | $99 |
| Utilities | $200 | $887 |
| Other | $10,507 | $10,966 |
Compare More Cities
The side-by-side above pulls the the Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances data for both entity A and entity B. What follows is the interpretation — which specific axes carry the most weight for entity A versus entity B, and which differences are large enough to influence a real decision.
Practical use of the comparison: read the data above, then drill into the individual entity A and entity B detail pages for the underlying breakdown. A pairwise comparison answers the relative question; the per-entity pages answer the absolute question.
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.