Spokane, WA vs Vancouver, WA
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Spokane, WA spends 21% more per resident than Vancouver, WA: $16,224 against $13,434. That gap is large enough to show up across most functional budget categories below.
Spokane, WA holds the stronger Fiscal Health Score, 70/100 (grade B) against 45/100 (grade D) for Vancouver, WA — a 25-point spread that puts the two in different grade territory.
Spokane, WA reports no outstanding debt per resident in its Census filing, while Vancouver, WA carries $866 per resident. Their budgets diverge on where the largest per-resident dollars go: Spokane, WA leads with police at $2,475 per resident, while Vancouver, WA leads with parks and recreation at $871.
They also fund themselves differently: intergovernmental transfers is the largest single revenue source in Spokane, WA at 38% of total revenue, whereas Vancouver, WA relies most on other revenue at 114%.
Summary
Spokane spends 20.8% more per capita than Vancouver ($2,789/person difference). Spokane, WA has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (B, 70/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Property Tax | $133 | $31 |
| Sales Tax | $359 | $456 |
| Income Tax | $724 | $140 |
| Intergovernmental | $5,005 | $141 |
| Charges & Fees | $0 | $2,641 |
| Other | $3,063 | $6,500 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Police | $2,475 | $0 |
| Fire Protection | $1,057 | $0 |
| Highways & Roads | $298 | $0 |
| Education | $0 | $3 |
| Public Welfare | $1,657 | $968 |
| Health | $8 | $0 |
| Hospitals | $224 | $661 |
| Parks & Recreation | $446 | $871 |
| Housing | $2,512 | $3,594 |
| Sewerage | $200 | $241 |
| Utilities | $1,624 | $2,481 |
| Other | $5,722 | $4,615 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.