Spokane Valley, WA vs Seattle, WA
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Seattle, WA outspends Spokane Valley, WA by a wide margin per resident — $34,463 versus $5,097, a 576% difference. A gap this size usually reflects a structurally different service mix or accounting scope rather than a single line item.
Spokane Valley, WA edges Seattle, WA on the Fiscal Health Score by 7 points — 68/100 (grade B) to 61/100 (grade C). At a margin this narrow the grade is close enough that the factor-level detail matters more than the composite.
On debt, Spokane Valley, WA carries the lighter load at $5 per resident versus $1,100 for Seattle, WA. Both cities pour the most per-resident dollars into the same function: parks and recreation leads in Spokane Valley, WA at $259 per resident and in Seattle, WA at $3,923.
They also fund themselves differently: other revenue is the largest single revenue source in Spokane Valley, WA at 34% of total revenue, whereas Seattle, WA relies most on intergovernmental transfers at 13%.
Summary
Seattle spends 85.2% more per capita than Spokane Valley ($29,365/person difference). Spokane Valley, WA has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (B, 68/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Property Tax | $201 | $1,831 |
| Sales Tax | $17 | $1,094 |
| Income Tax | $26 | $3,496 |
| Intergovernmental | $100 | $9,846 |
| Charges & Fees | $0 | $3,960 |
| Other | $421 | $8,544 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Police | $169 | $0 |
| Fire Protection | $189 | $210 |
| Highways & Roads | $112 | $0 |
| Education | $0 | $1,461 |
| Public Welfare | $784 | $3,439 |
| Health | $0 | $1,131 |
| Hospitals | $221 | $1,871 |
| Parks & Recreation | $259 | $3,923 |
| Housing | $2,595 | $3,727 |
| Sewerage | $43 | $952 |
| Utilities | $31 | $6,489 |
| Other | $695 | $11,260 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.