Seattle, WA vs El Paso, TX
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Seattle, WA spends 42% more per resident than El Paso, TX: $34,463 against $24,259. That gap is large enough to show up across most functional budget categories below.
On the CitySpend Fiscal Health Score the two are level: Seattle, WA and El Paso, TX both land at 61/100 (grade C and C respectively), so the deciding factors sit in the underlying six-factor breakdown rather than the rolled-up grade.
El Paso, TX reports no outstanding debt per resident in its Census filing, while Seattle, WA carries $1,100 per resident. Their budgets diverge on where the largest per-resident dollars go: Seattle, WA leads with parks and recreation at $3,923 per resident, while El Paso, TX leads with police at $1,159.
On the revenue side both lean hardest on intergovernmental transfers — 13% of total revenue in Seattle, WA and 10% in El Paso, TX.
Summary
Seattle spends 42.1% more per capita than El Paso ($10,204/person difference). Both cities share the same Fiscal Health Score.
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Property Tax | $1,831 | $0 |
| Sales Tax | $1,094 | $65 |
| Income Tax | $3,496 | $12 |
| Intergovernmental | $9,846 | $690 |
| Charges & Fees | $3,960 | $31 |
| Other | $8,544 | $550 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Police | $0 | $1,159 |
| Fire Protection | $210 | $233 |
| Highways & Roads | $0 | $83 |
| Education | $1,461 | $0 |
| Public Welfare | $3,439 | $299 |
| Health | $1,131 | $0 |
| Hospitals | $1,871 | $11 |
| Parks & Recreation | $3,923 | $151 |
| Housing | $3,727 | $958 |
| Sewerage | $952 | $6 |
| Utilities | $6,489 | $224 |
| Interest on Debt | $0 | $40 |
| General Admin | $0 | $17,951 |
| Other | $11,260 | $3,145 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.