Skip to main content
Data from U.S. Census Bureau · 2026 · Methodology
CitySpend

Seattle, WA vs Bakersfield, CA

Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)

Summary

Seattle spends 197.7% more per capita than Bakersfield ($22,887/person difference). Seattle, WA has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (C, 61/100).

Fiscal Health Score

City A
Seattle, WA
Pop. 734,603
C
61/100
Budget Balance69
Debt Burden50
Pension Funding76
Spending Efficiency22
Revenue Diversity100
Trend Direction50
City B
Bakersfield, CA
Pop. 404,321
C
56/100
Budget Balance2
Debt Burden100
Pension Funding76
Spending Efficiency100
Revenue Diversity0
Trend Direction50

Key Metrics

Metric
Seattle
Bakersfield
Total Spending
$25.3B
$4.7B
Spending / Capita
$34,463
$11,576
Total Revenue
$56.5B
$1.6B
Revenue / Capita
$76,958
$3,862
Total Debt
$808.1M
$0
Debt / Capita
$1,100
$0
Population
734,603
404,321
Gov Employees / 10K
0.0
0.0
Avg Gov Salary
$0
$0

Per Capita Spending by Department

Fire Protection
Seattle$210
Bakersfield$0
Parks & Recreation
Seattle$3,923
Bakersfield$741
Education
Seattle$1,461
Bakersfield$0
Health
Seattle$1,131
Bakersfield$0

Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)

SeattleBakersfield
Property Tax
$1,831
$1
Sales Tax
$1,094
$20
Income Tax
$3,496
$1,909
Intergovernmental
$9,846
$3,862
Charges & Fees
$3,960
$1,024
Other
$8,544
$1,915

Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)

SeattleBakersfield
Fire Protection
$210
$0
Education
$1,461
$0
Public Welfare
$3,439
$840
Health
$1,131
$0
Hospitals
$1,871
$425
Parks & Recreation
$3,923
$741
Housing
$3,727
$3,391
Sewerage
$952
$265
Utilities
$6,489
$2,679
Other
$11,260
$3,234
C
Seattle, WA
Fiscal Health Score: 61/100
Average fiscal health
C
Bakersfield, CA
Fiscal Health Score: 56/100
Average fiscal health

Compare More Cities