Seattle, WA vs Albuquerque, NM
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Seattle, WA outspends Albuquerque, NM by a wide margin per resident — $34,463 versus $17,237, a 100% difference. A gap this size usually reflects a structurally different service mix or accounting scope rather than a single line item.
Albuquerque, NM holds the stronger Fiscal Health Score, 81/100 (grade A) against 61/100 (grade C) for Seattle, WA — a 20-point spread that puts the two in different grade territory.
On debt, Albuquerque, NM carries the lighter load at $613 per resident versus $1,100 for Seattle, WA. Both cities pour the most per-resident dollars into the same function: parks and recreation leads in Seattle, WA at $3,923 per resident and in Albuquerque, NM at $1,990.
They also fund themselves differently: intergovernmental transfers is the largest single revenue source in Seattle, WA at 13% of total revenue, whereas Albuquerque, NM relies most on charges and fees at 11%.
Summary
Seattle spends 99.9% more per capita than Albuquerque ($17,225/person difference). Albuquerque, NM has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (A, 81/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Property Tax | $1,831 | $36 |
| Sales Tax | $1,094 | $355 |
| Income Tax | $3,496 | $1,580 |
| Intergovernmental | $9,846 | $1,897 |
| Charges & Fees | $3,960 | $2,633 |
| Other | $8,544 | $2,174 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Fire Protection | $210 | $440 |
| Highways & Roads | $0 | $172 |
| Education | $1,461 | $0 |
| Public Welfare | $3,439 | $419 |
| Health | $1,131 | $291 |
| Hospitals | $1,871 | $328 |
| Parks & Recreation | $3,923 | $1,990 |
| Housing | $3,727 | $4,080 |
| Sewerage | $952 | $0 |
| Utilities | $6,489 | $5,212 |
| Interest on Debt | $0 | $1,096 |
| Other | $11,260 | $3,209 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.