Scottsdale, AZ vs Phoenix, AZ
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Phoenix, AZ outspends Scottsdale, AZ by a wide margin per resident — $15,793 versus $21, a 73548% difference. A gap this size usually reflects a structurally different service mix or accounting scope rather than a single line item.
Scottsdale, AZ holds the stronger Fiscal Health Score, 90/100 (grade A) against 67/100 (grade B) for Phoenix, AZ — a 23-point spread that puts the two in different grade territory.
On debt, Scottsdale, AZ carries the lighter load at $2 per resident versus $1,156 for Phoenix, AZ. Both cities pour the most per-resident dollars into the same function: parks and recreation leads in Scottsdale, AZ at $2 per resident and in Phoenix, AZ at $652.
They also fund themselves differently: charges and fees is the largest single revenue source in Scottsdale, AZ at 13% of total revenue, whereas Phoenix, AZ relies most on intergovernmental transfers at 100%.
Summary
Phoenix spends 99.9% more per capita than Scottsdale ($15,771/person difference). Scottsdale, AZ has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (A, 90/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Property Tax | $0 | $7 |
| Sales Tax | $1 | $338 |
| Income Tax | $1 | $1,260 |
| Intergovernmental | $4 | $50,709 |
| Charges & Fees | $5 | $2,998 |
| Other | $4 | $2,038 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Fire Protection | $0 | $170 |
| Highways & Roads | $0 | $86 |
| Education | $0 | $214 |
| Public Welfare | $1 | $507 |
| Health | $0 | $258 |
| Hospitals | $0 | $1,521 |
| Parks & Recreation | $2 | $652 |
| Housing | $5 | $3,879 |
| Sewerage | $0 | $388 |
| Utilities | $4 | $2,480 |
| Interest on Debt | $0 | $1,760 |
| Other | $8 | $3,878 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.