San Jose, CA vs Tulsa, OK
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
San Jose, CA outspends Tulsa, OK by a wide margin per resident — $17,934 versus $5,250, a 242% difference. A gap this size usually reflects a structurally different service mix or accounting scope rather than a single line item.
San Jose, CA holds the stronger Fiscal Health Score, 90/100 (grade A) against 56/100 (grade C) for Tulsa, OK — a 34-point spread that puts the two in different grade territory.
Neither city reports outstanding debt per resident in its current Census filing, which removes debt service as a point of difference between them. Their budgets diverge on where the largest per-resident dollars go: San Jose, CA leads with parks and recreation at $1,424 per resident, while Tulsa, OK leads with health at $762.
Summary
San Jose spends 241.6% more per capita than Tulsa ($12,684/person difference). San Jose, CA has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (A, 90/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Property Tax | $40 | $0 |
| Sales Tax | $315 | $97 |
| Income Tax | $1,935 | $0 |
| Intergovernmental | $2,680 | $0 |
| Charges & Fees | $608 | $0 |
| Other | $3,519 | $53 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Police | $0 | $628 |
| Fire Protection | $0 | $196 |
| Highways & Roads | $0 | $257 |
| Public Welfare | $810 | $86 |
| Health | $609 | $762 |
| Hospitals | $1,254 | $0 |
| Parks & Recreation | $1,424 | $154 |
| Housing | $4,897 | $350 |
| Sewerage | $161 | $27 |
| Utilities | $2,533 | $41 |
| Other | $6,247 | $2,748 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.