San Jose, CA vs Raleigh, NC
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
San Jose, CA spends 29% more per resident than Raleigh, NC: $17,934 against $13,911. That gap is large enough to show up across most functional budget categories below.
San Jose, CA holds the stronger Fiscal Health Score, 90/100 (grade A) against 76/100 (grade B) for Raleigh, NC — a 14-point spread that puts the two in different grade territory.
San Jose, CA reports no outstanding debt per resident in its Census filing, while Raleigh, NC carries $906 per resident. Both cities pour the most per-resident dollars into the same function: parks and recreation leads in San Jose, CA at $1,424 per resident and in Raleigh, NC at $1,391.
They also fund themselves differently: other revenue is the largest single revenue source in San Jose, CA at 9% of total revenue, whereas Raleigh, NC relies most on intergovernmental transfers at 47%.
Summary
San Jose spends 28.9% more per capita than Raleigh ($4,024/person difference). San Jose, CA has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (A, 90/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Property Tax | $40 | $0 |
| Sales Tax | $315 | $858 |
| Income Tax | $1,935 | $806 |
| Intergovernmental | $2,680 | $14,128 |
| Charges & Fees | $608 | $2,681 |
| Other | $3,519 | $4,740 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Fire Protection | $0 | $277 |
| Highways & Roads | $0 | $448 |
| Education | $0 | $6 |
| Public Welfare | $810 | $498 |
| Health | $609 | $0 |
| Hospitals | $1,254 | $669 |
| Parks & Recreation | $1,424 | $1,391 |
| Housing | $4,897 | $2,712 |
| Sewerage | $161 | $281 |
| Utilities | $2,533 | $2,469 |
| Interest on Debt | $0 | $1,513 |
| Other | $6,247 | $3,646 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.