San Jose, CA vs Bakersfield, CA
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
San Jose, CA spends 55% more per resident than Bakersfield, CA: $17,934 against $11,576. That gap is large enough to show up across most functional budget categories below.
San Jose, CA holds the stronger Fiscal Health Score, 90/100 (grade A) against 56/100 (grade C) for Bakersfield, CA — a 34-point spread that puts the two in different grade territory.
Neither city reports outstanding debt per resident in its current Census filing, which removes debt service as a point of difference between them. Both cities pour the most per-resident dollars into the same function: parks and recreation leads in San Jose, CA at $1,424 per resident and in Bakersfield, CA at $741.
They also fund themselves differently: other revenue is the largest single revenue source in San Jose, CA at 9% of total revenue, whereas Bakersfield, CA relies most on intergovernmental transfers at 100%.
Summary
San Jose spends 54.9% more per capita than Bakersfield ($6,359/person difference). San Jose, CA has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (A, 90/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Property Tax | $40 | $1 |
| Sales Tax | $315 | $20 |
| Income Tax | $1,935 | $1,909 |
| Intergovernmental | $2,680 | $3,862 |
| Charges & Fees | $608 | $1,024 |
| Other | $3,519 | $1,915 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Public Welfare | $810 | $840 |
| Health | $609 | $0 |
| Hospitals | $1,254 | $425 |
| Parks & Recreation | $1,424 | $741 |
| Housing | $4,897 | $3,391 |
| Sewerage | $161 | $265 |
| Utilities | $2,533 | $2,679 |
| Other | $6,247 | $3,234 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.