San Francisco, CA vs Wichita, KS
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
San Francisco, CA outspends Wichita, KS by a wide margin per resident — $184,131 versus $7,986, a 2206% difference. A gap this size usually reflects a structurally different service mix or accounting scope rather than a single line item.
Wichita, KS holds the stronger Fiscal Health Score, 90/100 (grade A) against 48/100 (grade D) for San Francisco, CA — a 42-point spread that puts the two in different grade territory.
On debt, Wichita, KS carries the lighter load at $132 per resident versus $2,031 for San Francisco, CA. Both cities pour the most per-resident dollars into the same function: parks and recreation leads in San Francisco, CA at $4,119 per resident and in Wichita, KS at $874.
On the revenue side both lean hardest on intergovernmental transfers — 7% of total revenue in San Francisco, CA and 14% in Wichita, KS.
Summary
San Francisco spends 2205.7% more per capita than Wichita ($176,145/person difference). Wichita, KS has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (A, 90/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Property Tax | $148 | $0 |
| Sales Tax | $3,028 | $246 |
| Income Tax | $269 | $57 |
| Intergovernmental | $19,762 | $3,895 |
| Charges & Fees | $7,961 | $3,193 |
| Other | $18,918 | $2,783 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Police | $3,351 | $0 |
| Fire Protection | $2,281 | $152 |
| Highways & Roads | $0 | $126 |
| Education | $0 | $2 |
| Public Welfare | $2,203 | $441 |
| Health | $1,911 | $254 |
| Hospitals | $6,939 | $113 |
| Parks & Recreation | $4,119 | $874 |
| Housing | $9,315 | $2,618 |
| Sewerage | $1,423 | $0 |
| Utilities | $21,190 | $1,225 |
| Interest on Debt | $22,798 | $70 |
| General Admin | $14,899 | $0 |
| Other | $93,702 | $2,111 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.