San Francisco, CA vs Oklahoma City, OK
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
San Francisco, CA outspends Oklahoma City, OK by a wide margin per resident — $184,131 versus $18,074, a 919% difference. A gap this size usually reflects a structurally different service mix or accounting scope rather than a single line item.
Oklahoma City, OK holds the stronger Fiscal Health Score, 65/100 (grade B) against 48/100 (grade D) for San Francisco, CA — a 17-point spread that puts the two in different grade territory.
On debt, San Francisco, CA carries the lighter load at $2,031 per resident versus $3,520 for Oklahoma City, OK. Both cities pour the most per-resident dollars into the same function: parks and recreation leads in San Francisco, CA at $4,119 per resident and in Oklahoma City, OK at $2,014.
On the revenue side both lean hardest on intergovernmental transfers — 7% of total revenue in San Francisco, CA and 19% in Oklahoma City, OK.
Summary
San Francisco spends 918.8% more per capita than Oklahoma City ($166,058/person difference). Oklahoma City, OK has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (B, 65/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Property Tax | $148 | $0 |
| Sales Tax | $3,028 | $763 |
| Income Tax | $269 | $1,037 |
| Intergovernmental | $19,762 | $6,852 |
| Charges & Fees | $7,961 | $3,256 |
| Other | $18,918 | $1,836 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Police | $3,351 | $0 |
| Fire Protection | $2,281 | $513 |
| Public Welfare | $2,203 | $1,525 |
| Health | $1,911 | $5 |
| Hospitals | $6,939 | $2,044 |
| Parks & Recreation | $4,119 | $2,014 |
| Housing | $9,315 | $2,857 |
| Sewerage | $1,423 | $0 |
| Utilities | $21,190 | $4,523 |
| Interest on Debt | $22,798 | $707 |
| General Admin | $14,899 | $0 |
| Other | $93,702 | $3,886 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.