San Francisco, CA vs Minneapolis, MN
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Summary
San Francisco spends 740.4% more per capita than Minneapolis ($162,221/person difference). Minneapolis, MN has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (B, 65/100).
Fiscal Health Score
D
48/100
Budget Balance70
Debt Burden0
Pension Funding76
Spending Efficiency0
Revenue Diversity100
Trend Direction50
B
65/100
Budget Balance17
Debt Burden91
Pension Funding76
Spending Efficiency80
Revenue Diversity100
Trend Direction50
Key Metrics
Metric
San Francisco
Minneapolis
Total Spending
$156.7B
$9.4B
Spending / Capita
$184,131
$21,910
Total Revenue
$232.3B
$8.2B
Revenue / Capita
$272,907
$19,159
Total Debt
$1.7B
$274.8M
Debt / Capita
$2,031
$644
Population
851,036
426,877
Gov Employees / 10K
0.0
0.0
Avg Gov Salary
$0
$0
Per Capita Spending by Department
Police
San Francisco$3,351
Minneapolis$0
Fire Protection
San Francisco$2,281
Minneapolis$683
Highways & Roads
San Francisco$0
Minneapolis$221
Parks & Recreation
San Francisco$4,119
Minneapolis$3,486
Health
San Francisco$1,911
Minneapolis$0
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
San FranciscoMinneapolis
| Property Tax | $148 | $0 |
| Sales Tax | $3,028 | $1,989 |
| Income Tax | $269 | $994 |
| Intergovernmental | $19,762 | $2,929 |
| Charges & Fees | $7,961 | $2,040 |
| Other | $18,918 | $3,254 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
San FranciscoMinneapolis
| Police | $3,351 | $0 |
| Fire Protection | $2,281 | $683 |
| Highways & Roads | $0 | $221 |
| Public Welfare | $2,203 | $1,500 |
| Health | $1,911 | $0 |
| Hospitals | $6,939 | $0 |
| Parks & Recreation | $4,119 | $3,486 |
| Housing | $9,315 | $4,133 |
| Sewerage | $1,423 | $570 |
| Utilities | $21,190 | $2,398 |
| Interest on Debt | $22,798 | $0 |
| General Admin | $14,899 | $0 |
| Other | $93,702 | $8,919 |
D
San Francisco, CA
Fiscal Health Score: 48/100
Below average fiscal health
B
Minneapolis, MN
Fiscal Health Score: 65/100
Good fiscal health