San Francisco, CA vs Las Vegas, NV
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Summary
San Francisco spends 1926.7% more per capita than Las Vegas ($175,046/person difference). Las Vegas, NV has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (A, 82/100).
Fiscal Health Score
D
48/100
Budget Balance70
Debt Burden0
Pension Funding76
Spending Efficiency0
Revenue Diversity100
Trend Direction50
A
82/100
Budget Balance66
Debt Burden100
Pension Funding76
Spending Efficiency100
Revenue Diversity100
Trend Direction50
Key Metrics
Metric
San Francisco
Las Vegas
Total Spending
$156.7B
$5.9B
Spending / Capita
$184,131
$9,085
Total Revenue
$232.3B
$5.3B
Revenue / Capita
$272,907
$8,251
Total Debt
$1.7B
$0
Debt / Capita
$2,031
$0
Population
851,036
644,835
Gov Employees / 10K
0.0
0.0
Avg Gov Salary
$0
$0
Per Capita Spending by Department
Police
San Francisco$3,351
Las Vegas$945
Fire Protection
San Francisco$2,281
Las Vegas$280
Highways & Roads
San Francisco$0
Las Vegas$45
Parks & Recreation
San Francisco$4,119
Las Vegas$1,028
Health
San Francisco$1,911
Las Vegas$0
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
San FranciscoLas Vegas
| Property Tax | $148 | $50 |
| Sales Tax | $3,028 | $386 |
| Income Tax | $269 | $0 |
| Intergovernmental | $19,762 | $1,137 |
| Charges & Fees | $7,961 | $0 |
| Other | $18,918 | $2,806 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
San FranciscoLas Vegas
| Police | $3,351 | $945 |
| Fire Protection | $2,281 | $280 |
| Highways & Roads | $0 | $45 |
| Public Welfare | $2,203 | $705 |
| Health | $1,911 | $0 |
| Hospitals | $6,939 | $356 |
| Parks & Recreation | $4,119 | $1,028 |
| Housing | $9,315 | $23 |
| Sewerage | $1,423 | $332 |
| Utilities | $21,190 | $129 |
| Interest on Debt | $22,798 | $0 |
| General Admin | $14,899 | $0 |
| Other | $93,702 | $5,243 |
D
San Francisco, CA
Fiscal Health Score: 48/100
Below average fiscal health
A
Las Vegas, NV
Fiscal Health Score: 82/100
Excellent fiscal health