San Francisco, CA vs Columbus, OH
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
San Francisco, CA outspends Columbus, OH by a wide margin per resident — $184,131 versus $18,858, a 876% difference. A gap this size usually reflects a structurally different service mix or accounting scope rather than a single line item.
Columbus, OH edges San Francisco, CA on the Fiscal Health Score by 4 points — 52/100 (grade C) to 48/100 (grade D). At a margin this narrow the grade is close enough that the factor-level detail matters more than the composite.
On debt, Columbus, OH carries the lighter load at $1,145 per resident versus $2,031 for San Francisco, CA. Both cities pour the most per-resident dollars into the same function: parks and recreation leads in San Francisco, CA at $4,119 per resident and in Columbus, OH at $2,168.
Summary
San Francisco spends 876.4% more per capita than Columbus ($165,273/person difference). Columbus, OH has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (C, 52/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Property Tax | $148 | $10 |
| Sales Tax | $3,028 | $234 |
| Income Tax | $269 | $1 |
| Intergovernmental | $19,762 | $0 |
| Charges & Fees | $7,961 | $2,389 |
| Other | $18,918 | $5,248 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Police | $3,351 | $0 |
| Fire Protection | $2,281 | $1,016 |
| Highways & Roads | $0 | $224 |
| Public Welfare | $2,203 | $878 |
| Health | $1,911 | $0 |
| Hospitals | $6,939 | $953 |
| Parks & Recreation | $4,119 | $2,168 |
| Housing | $9,315 | $4,303 |
| Sewerage | $1,423 | $1 |
| Utilities | $21,190 | $1,719 |
| Interest on Debt | $22,798 | $0 |
| General Admin | $14,899 | $0 |
| Other | $93,702 | $7,595 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.