San Francisco, CA vs Charlotte, NC
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
San Francisco, CA outspends Charlotte, NC by a wide margin per resident — $184,131 versus $15,854, a 1061% difference. A gap this size usually reflects a structurally different service mix or accounting scope rather than a single line item.
Charlotte, NC holds the stronger Fiscal Health Score, 63/100 (grade C) against 48/100 (grade D) for San Francisco, CA — a 15-point spread that puts the two in different grade territory.
On debt, San Francisco, CA carries the lighter load at $2,031 per resident versus $2,690 for Charlotte, NC. Both cities pour the most per-resident dollars into the same function: parks and recreation leads in San Francisco, CA at $4,119 per resident and in Charlotte, NC at $1,571.
They also fund themselves differently: intergovernmental transfers is the largest single revenue source in San Francisco, CA at 7% of total revenue, whereas Charlotte, NC relies most on other revenue at 10%.
Summary
San Francisco spends 1061.4% more per capita than Charlotte ($168,278/person difference). Charlotte, NC has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (C, 63/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Property Tax | $148 | $0 |
| Sales Tax | $3,028 | $541 |
| Income Tax | $269 | $366 |
| Intergovernmental | $19,762 | $1,859 |
| Charges & Fees | $7,961 | $2,459 |
| Other | $18,918 | $4,866 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Police | $3,351 | $0 |
| Fire Protection | $2,281 | $463 |
| Highways & Roads | $0 | $41 |
| Public Welfare | $2,203 | $672 |
| Health | $1,911 | $0 |
| Hospitals | $6,939 | $1,243 |
| Parks & Recreation | $4,119 | $1,571 |
| Housing | $9,315 | $3,944 |
| Sewerage | $1,423 | $0 |
| Utilities | $21,190 | $2,244 |
| Interest on Debt | $22,798 | $2,226 |
| General Admin | $14,899 | $0 |
| Other | $93,702 | $3,448 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.