San Francisco, CA vs Atlanta, GA
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
San Francisco, CA outspends Atlanta, GA by a wide margin per resident — $184,131 versus $25,457, a 623% difference. A gap this size usually reflects a structurally different service mix or accounting scope rather than a single line item.
Atlanta, GA holds the stronger Fiscal Health Score, 85/100 (grade A) against 48/100 (grade D) for San Francisco, CA — a 37-point spread that puts the two in different grade territory.
Atlanta, GA reports no outstanding debt per resident in its Census filing, while San Francisco, CA carries $2,031 per resident. Both cities pour the most per-resident dollars into the same function: parks and recreation leads in San Francisco, CA at $4,119 per resident and in Atlanta, GA at $1,274.
On the revenue side both lean hardest on intergovernmental transfers — 7% of total revenue in San Francisco, CA and 6% in Atlanta, GA.
Summary
San Francisco spends 623.3% more per capita than Atlanta ($158,674/person difference). Atlanta, GA has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (A, 85/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Property Tax | $148 | $419 |
| Sales Tax | $3,028 | $0 |
| Income Tax | $269 | $1,292 |
| Intergovernmental | $19,762 | $9,121 |
| Charges & Fees | $7,961 | $5,645 |
| Other | $18,918 | $5,461 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Police | $3,351 | $315 |
| Fire Protection | $2,281 | $464 |
| Highways & Roads | $0 | $513 |
| Education | $0 | $25 |
| Public Welfare | $2,203 | $1,587 |
| Health | $1,911 | $0 |
| Hospitals | $6,939 | $55 |
| Parks & Recreation | $4,119 | $1,274 |
| Housing | $9,315 | $4,594 |
| Sewerage | $1,423 | $343 |
| Utilities | $21,190 | $8,026 |
| Interest on Debt | $22,798 | $0 |
| General Admin | $14,899 | $0 |
| Other | $93,702 | $8,262 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.