San Diego, CA vs Omaha, NE
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
San Diego, CA outspends Omaha, NE by a wide margin per resident — $43,306 versus $11,180, a 287% difference. A gap this size usually reflects a structurally different service mix or accounting scope rather than a single line item.
Omaha, NE holds the stronger Fiscal Health Score, 90/100 (grade A) against 53/100 (grade C) for San Diego, CA — a 37-point spread that puts the two in different grade territory.
Neither city reports outstanding debt per resident in its current Census filing, which removes debt service as a point of difference between them. Their budgets diverge on where the largest per-resident dollars go: San Diego, CA leads with police at $3,335 per resident, while Omaha, NE leads with parks and recreation at $742.
On the revenue side both lean hardest on other revenue — 39% of total revenue in San Diego, CA and 17% in Omaha, NE.
Summary
San Diego spends 287.4% more per capita than Omaha ($32,126/person difference). Omaha, NE has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (A, 90/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Property Tax | $124 | $624 |
| Sales Tax | $63 | $373 |
| Income Tax | $194 | $0 |
| Intergovernmental | $57 | $2,622 |
| Charges & Fees | $14 | $0 |
| Other | $3,801 | $4,672 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Police | $3,335 | $0 |
| Fire Protection | $1,278 | $0 |
| Highways & Roads | $1,408 | $319 |
| Education | $2,005 | $0 |
| Public Welfare | $700 | $1,521 |
| Health | $411 | $456 |
| Parks & Recreation | $436 | $742 |
| Housing | $4,476 | $3,045 |
| Sewerage | $43 | $0 |
| Utilities | $11,704 | $581 |
| Other | $17,509 | $4,516 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.