San Diego, CA vs Kansas City, MO
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
San Diego, CA outspends Kansas City, MO by a wide margin per resident — $43,306 versus $22,820, a 90% difference. A gap this size usually reflects a structurally different service mix or accounting scope rather than a single line item.
San Diego, CA edges Kansas City, MO on the Fiscal Health Score by 1 points — 53/100 (grade C) to 52/100 (grade C). At a margin this narrow the grade is close enough that the factor-level detail matters more than the composite.
Neither city reports outstanding debt per resident in its current Census filing, which removes debt service as a point of difference between them. Their budgets diverge on where the largest per-resident dollars go: San Diego, CA leads with police at $3,335 per resident, while Kansas City, MO leads with parks and recreation at $1,309.
On the revenue side both lean hardest on other revenue — 39% of total revenue in San Diego, CA and 835% in Kansas City, MO.
Summary
San Diego spends 89.8% more per capita than Kansas City ($20,487/person difference). San Diego, CA has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (C, 53/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Property Tax | $124 | $0 |
| Sales Tax | $63 | $623 |
| Income Tax | $194 | $0 |
| Intergovernmental | $57 | $7 |
| Charges & Fees | $14 | $3,794 |
| Other | $3,801 | $11,150 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Police | $3,335 | $0 |
| Fire Protection | $1,278 | $119 |
| Highways & Roads | $1,408 | $0 |
| Education | $2,005 | $0 |
| Public Welfare | $700 | $3,018 |
| Health | $411 | $0 |
| Hospitals | $0 | $1,849 |
| Parks & Recreation | $436 | $1,309 |
| Housing | $4,476 | $4,681 |
| Sewerage | $43 | $0 |
| Utilities | $11,704 | $3,123 |
| Other | $17,509 | $8,721 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.