San Diego, CA vs Austin, TX
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
San Diego, CA outspends Austin, TX by a wide margin per resident — $43,306 versus $21,772, a 99% difference. A gap this size usually reflects a structurally different service mix or accounting scope rather than a single line item.
Austin, TX holds the stronger Fiscal Health Score, 75/100 (grade B) against 53/100 (grade C) for San Diego, CA — a 22-point spread that puts the two in different grade territory.
San Diego, CA reports no outstanding debt per resident in its Census filing, while Austin, TX carries $1,229 per resident. Their budgets diverge on where the largest per-resident dollars go: San Diego, CA leads with police at $3,335 per resident, while Austin, TX leads with parks and recreation at $1,801.
They also fund themselves differently: other revenue is the largest single revenue source in San Diego, CA at 39% of total revenue, whereas Austin, TX relies most on intergovernmental transfers at 18%.
Summary
San Diego spends 98.9% more per capita than Austin ($21,534/person difference). Austin, TX has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (B, 75/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Property Tax | $124 | $0 |
| Sales Tax | $63 | $526 |
| Income Tax | $194 | $1,465 |
| Intergovernmental | $57 | $14,031 |
| Charges & Fees | $14 | $3,247 |
| Other | $3,801 | $5,645 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Police | $3,335 | $0 |
| Fire Protection | $1,278 | $634 |
| Highways & Roads | $1,408 | $0 |
| Education | $2,005 | $51 |
| Public Welfare | $700 | $1,837 |
| Health | $411 | $517 |
| Hospitals | $0 | $664 |
| Parks & Recreation | $436 | $1,801 |
| Housing | $4,476 | $3,741 |
| Sewerage | $43 | $865 |
| Utilities | $11,704 | $3,264 |
| Other | $17,509 | $8,399 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.