San Antonio, TX vs Wichita, KS
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
San Antonio, TX outspends Wichita, KS by a wide margin per resident — $16,943 versus $7,986, a 112% difference. A gap this size usually reflects a structurally different service mix or accounting scope rather than a single line item.
Wichita, KS holds the stronger Fiscal Health Score, 90/100 (grade A) against 68/100 (grade B) for San Antonio, TX — a 22-point spread that puts the two in different grade territory.
On debt, Wichita, KS carries the lighter load at $132 per resident versus $2,131 for San Antonio, TX. Both cities pour the most per-resident dollars into the same function: parks and recreation leads in San Antonio, TX at $1,045 per resident and in Wichita, KS at $874.
On the revenue side both lean hardest on intergovernmental transfers — 17% of total revenue in San Antonio, TX and 14% in Wichita, KS.
Summary
San Antonio spends 112.2% more per capita than Wichita ($8,957/person difference). Wichita, KS has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (A, 90/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Property Tax | $9 | $0 |
| Sales Tax | $293 | $246 |
| Income Tax | $1,000 | $57 |
| Intergovernmental | $14,312 | $3,895 |
| Charges & Fees | $4,025 | $3,193 |
| Other | $3,184 | $2,783 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Fire Protection | $396 | $152 |
| Highways & Roads | $158 | $126 |
| Education | $23 | $2 |
| Public Welfare | $1,188 | $441 |
| Health | $293 | $254 |
| Hospitals | $993 | $113 |
| Parks & Recreation | $1,045 | $874 |
| Housing | $3,570 | $2,618 |
| Sewerage | $100 | $0 |
| Utilities | $3,826 | $1,225 |
| Interest on Debt | $0 | $70 |
| Other | $5,352 | $2,111 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.