San Antonio, TX vs San Jose, CA
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
San Jose, CA and San Antonio, TX spend within 5.9% of each other per resident — $17,934 versus $16,943 — so on the headline spending-per-capita measure the two cities are effectively neck and neck.
San Jose, CA holds the stronger Fiscal Health Score, 90/100 (grade A) against 68/100 (grade B) for San Antonio, TX — a 22-point spread that puts the two in different grade territory.
San Jose, CA reports no outstanding debt per resident in its Census filing, while San Antonio, TX carries $2,131 per resident. Both cities pour the most per-resident dollars into the same function: parks and recreation leads in San Antonio, TX at $1,045 per resident and in San Jose, CA at $1,424.
They also fund themselves differently: intergovernmental transfers is the largest single revenue source in San Antonio, TX at 17% of total revenue, whereas San Jose, CA relies most on other revenue at 9%.
Summary
San Jose spends 5.5% more per capita than San Antonio ($992/person difference). San Jose, CA has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (A, 90/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Property Tax | $9 | $40 |
| Sales Tax | $293 | $315 |
| Income Tax | $1,000 | $1,935 |
| Intergovernmental | $14,312 | $2,680 |
| Charges & Fees | $4,025 | $608 |
| Other | $3,184 | $3,519 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Fire Protection | $396 | $0 |
| Highways & Roads | $158 | $0 |
| Education | $23 | $0 |
| Public Welfare | $1,188 | $810 |
| Health | $293 | $609 |
| Hospitals | $993 | $1,254 |
| Parks & Recreation | $1,045 | $1,424 |
| Housing | $3,570 | $4,897 |
| Sewerage | $100 | $161 |
| Utilities | $3,826 | $2,533 |
| Other | $5,352 | $6,247 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.