San Antonio, TX vs San Francisco, CA
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
San Francisco, CA outspends San Antonio, TX by a wide margin per resident — $184,131 versus $16,943, a 987% difference. A gap this size usually reflects a structurally different service mix or accounting scope rather than a single line item.
San Antonio, TX holds the stronger Fiscal Health Score, 68/100 (grade B) against 48/100 (grade D) for San Francisco, CA — a 20-point spread that puts the two in different grade territory.
On debt, San Francisco, CA carries the lighter load at $2,031 per resident versus $2,131 for San Antonio, TX. Both cities pour the most per-resident dollars into the same function: parks and recreation leads in San Antonio, TX at $1,045 per resident and in San Francisco, CA at $4,119.
On the revenue side both lean hardest on intergovernmental transfers — 17% of total revenue in San Antonio, TX and 7% in San Francisco, CA.
Summary
San Francisco spends 90.8% more per capita than San Antonio ($167,188/person difference). San Antonio, TX has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (B, 68/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Property Tax | $9 | $148 |
| Sales Tax | $293 | $3,028 |
| Income Tax | $1,000 | $269 |
| Intergovernmental | $14,312 | $19,762 |
| Charges & Fees | $4,025 | $7,961 |
| Other | $3,184 | $18,918 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Police | $0 | $3,351 |
| Fire Protection | $396 | $2,281 |
| Highways & Roads | $158 | $0 |
| Education | $23 | $0 |
| Public Welfare | $1,188 | $2,203 |
| Health | $293 | $1,911 |
| Hospitals | $993 | $6,939 |
| Parks & Recreation | $1,045 | $4,119 |
| Housing | $3,570 | $9,315 |
| Sewerage | $100 | $1,423 |
| Utilities | $3,826 | $21,190 |
| Interest on Debt | $0 | $22,798 |
| General Admin | $0 | $14,899 |
| Other | $5,352 | $93,702 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.