San Antonio, TX vs Bakersfield, CA
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
San Antonio, TX spends 46% more per resident than Bakersfield, CA: $16,943 against $11,576. That gap is large enough to show up across most functional budget categories below.
San Antonio, TX holds the stronger Fiscal Health Score, 68/100 (grade B) against 56/100 (grade C) for Bakersfield, CA — a 12-point spread that puts the two in different grade territory.
Bakersfield, CA reports no outstanding debt per resident in its Census filing, while San Antonio, TX carries $2,131 per resident. Both cities pour the most per-resident dollars into the same function: parks and recreation leads in San Antonio, TX at $1,045 per resident and in Bakersfield, CA at $741.
On the revenue side both lean hardest on intergovernmental transfers — 17% of total revenue in San Antonio, TX and 100% in Bakersfield, CA.
Summary
San Antonio spends 46.4% more per capita than Bakersfield ($5,367/person difference). San Antonio, TX has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (B, 68/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Property Tax | $9 | $1 |
| Sales Tax | $293 | $20 |
| Income Tax | $1,000 | $1,909 |
| Intergovernmental | $14,312 | $3,862 |
| Charges & Fees | $4,025 | $1,024 |
| Other | $3,184 | $1,915 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Fire Protection | $396 | $0 |
| Highways & Roads | $158 | $0 |
| Education | $23 | $0 |
| Public Welfare | $1,188 | $840 |
| Health | $293 | $0 |
| Hospitals | $993 | $425 |
| Parks & Recreation | $1,045 | $741 |
| Housing | $3,570 | $3,391 |
| Sewerage | $100 | $265 |
| Utilities | $3,826 | $2,679 |
| Other | $5,352 | $3,234 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.