Sacramento, CA vs Tulsa, OK
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Summary
Sacramento spends 1252.7% more per capita than Tulsa ($65,770/person difference). Sacramento, CA has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (C, 57/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Property Tax | $1,465 | $0 |
| Sales Tax | $378 | $97 |
| Income Tax | $3,104 | $0 |
| Intergovernmental | $3,400 | $0 |
| Charges & Fees | $3,239 | $0 |
| Other | $5,072 | $53 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Police | $5,402 | $628 |
| Fire Protection | $2,466 | $196 |
| Highways & Roads | $0 | $257 |
| Education | $2,684 | $0 |
| Public Welfare | $3,470 | $86 |
| Health | $18 | $762 |
| Parks & Recreation | $1,437 | $154 |
| Housing | $8,577 | $350 |
| Sewerage | $103 | $27 |
| Utilities | $19,920 | $41 |
| Interest on Debt | $162 | $0 |
| Other | $26,782 | $2,748 |
Compare More Cities
The side-by-side above pulls the the Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances data for both entity A and entity B. What follows is the interpretation — which specific axes carry the most weight for entity A versus entity B, and which differences are large enough to influence a real decision.
Practical use of the comparison: read the data above, then drill into the individual entity A and entity B detail pages for the underlying breakdown. A pairwise comparison answers the relative question; the per-entity pages answer the absolute question.
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.