Sacramento, CA vs Seattle, WA
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Sacramento, CA outspends Seattle, WA by a wide margin per resident — $71,020 versus $34,463, a 106% difference. A gap this size usually reflects a structurally different service mix or accounting scope rather than a single line item.
Seattle, WA edges Sacramento, CA on the Fiscal Health Score by 4 points — 61/100 (grade C) to 57/100 (grade C). At a margin this narrow the grade is close enough that the factor-level detail matters more than the composite.
Sacramento, CA reports no outstanding debt per resident in its Census filing, while Seattle, WA carries $1,100 per resident. Their budgets diverge on where the largest per-resident dollars go: Sacramento, CA leads with police at $5,402 per resident, while Seattle, WA leads with parks and recreation at $3,923.
They also fund themselves differently: other revenue is the largest single revenue source in Sacramento, CA at 8% of total revenue, whereas Seattle, WA relies most on intergovernmental transfers at 13%.
Summary
Sacramento spends 106.1% more per capita than Seattle ($36,558/person difference). Seattle, WA has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (C, 61/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Property Tax | $1,465 | $1,831 |
| Sales Tax | $378 | $1,094 |
| Income Tax | $3,104 | $3,496 |
| Intergovernmental | $3,400 | $9,846 |
| Charges & Fees | $3,239 | $3,960 |
| Other | $5,072 | $8,544 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Police | $5,402 | $0 |
| Fire Protection | $2,466 | $210 |
| Education | $2,684 | $1,461 |
| Public Welfare | $3,470 | $3,439 |
| Health | $18 | $1,131 |
| Hospitals | $0 | $1,871 |
| Parks & Recreation | $1,437 | $3,923 |
| Housing | $8,577 | $3,727 |
| Sewerage | $103 | $952 |
| Utilities | $19,920 | $6,489 |
| Interest on Debt | $162 | $0 |
| Other | $26,782 | $11,260 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.