Sacramento, CA vs Minneapolis, MN
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Sacramento, CA outspends Minneapolis, MN by a wide margin per resident — $71,020 versus $21,910, a 224% difference. A gap this size usually reflects a structurally different service mix or accounting scope rather than a single line item.
Minneapolis, MN holds the stronger Fiscal Health Score, 65/100 (grade B) against 57/100 (grade C) for Sacramento, CA — a 8-point spread that puts the two in different grade territory.
Sacramento, CA reports no outstanding debt per resident in its Census filing, while Minneapolis, MN carries $644 per resident. Their budgets diverge on where the largest per-resident dollars go: Sacramento, CA leads with police at $5,402 per resident, while Minneapolis, MN leads with parks and recreation at $3,486.
On the revenue side both lean hardest on other revenue — 8% of total revenue in Sacramento, CA and 17% in Minneapolis, MN.
Summary
Sacramento spends 224.1% more per capita than Minneapolis ($49,111/person difference). Minneapolis, MN has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (B, 65/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Property Tax | $1,465 | $0 |
| Sales Tax | $378 | $1,989 |
| Income Tax | $3,104 | $994 |
| Intergovernmental | $3,400 | $2,929 |
| Charges & Fees | $3,239 | $2,040 |
| Other | $5,072 | $3,254 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Police | $5,402 | $0 |
| Fire Protection | $2,466 | $683 |
| Highways & Roads | $0 | $221 |
| Education | $2,684 | $0 |
| Public Welfare | $3,470 | $1,500 |
| Health | $18 | $0 |
| Parks & Recreation | $1,437 | $3,486 |
| Housing | $8,577 | $4,133 |
| Sewerage | $103 | $570 |
| Utilities | $19,920 | $2,398 |
| Interest on Debt | $162 | $0 |
| Other | $26,782 | $8,919 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.