Sacramento, CA vs Albuquerque, NM
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Sacramento, CA outspends Albuquerque, NM by a wide margin per resident — $71,020 versus $17,237, a 312% difference. A gap this size usually reflects a structurally different service mix or accounting scope rather than a single line item.
Albuquerque, NM holds the stronger Fiscal Health Score, 81/100 (grade A) against 57/100 (grade C) for Sacramento, CA — a 24-point spread that puts the two in different grade territory.
Sacramento, CA reports no outstanding debt per resident in its Census filing, while Albuquerque, NM carries $613 per resident. Their budgets diverge on where the largest per-resident dollars go: Sacramento, CA leads with police at $5,402 per resident, while Albuquerque, NM leads with parks and recreation at $1,990.
They also fund themselves differently: other revenue is the largest single revenue source in Sacramento, CA at 8% of total revenue, whereas Albuquerque, NM relies most on charges and fees at 11%.
Summary
Sacramento spends 312.0% more per capita than Albuquerque ($53,783/person difference). Albuquerque, NM has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (A, 81/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Property Tax | $1,465 | $36 |
| Sales Tax | $378 | $355 |
| Income Tax | $3,104 | $1,580 |
| Intergovernmental | $3,400 | $1,897 |
| Charges & Fees | $3,239 | $2,633 |
| Other | $5,072 | $2,174 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Police | $5,402 | $0 |
| Fire Protection | $2,466 | $440 |
| Highways & Roads | $0 | $172 |
| Education | $2,684 | $0 |
| Public Welfare | $3,470 | $419 |
| Health | $18 | $291 |
| Hospitals | $0 | $328 |
| Parks & Recreation | $1,437 | $1,990 |
| Housing | $8,577 | $4,080 |
| Sewerage | $103 | $0 |
| Utilities | $19,920 | $5,212 |
| Interest on Debt | $162 | $1,096 |
| Other | $26,782 | $3,209 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.