Rockford, IL vs Aurora, IL
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Summary
Rockford spends 26.5% more per capita than Aurora ($4,047/person difference). Aurora, IL has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (A, 87/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Sales Tax | $749 | $114 |
| Income Tax | $0 | $144 |
| Intergovernmental | $6,178 | $2,481 |
| Charges & Fees | $2,152 | $2,224 |
| Other | $2,314 | $1,114 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Fire Protection | $0 | $216 |
| Public Welfare | $724 | $922 |
| Health | $593 | $0 |
| Hospitals | $0 | $257 |
| Parks & Recreation | $2,329 | $494 |
| Housing | $4,267 | $4,836 |
| Utilities | $1,320 | $2,366 |
| Other | $10,115 | $6,210 |
Compare More Cities
The side-by-side above pulls the the Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances data for both entity A and entity B. What follows is the interpretation — which specific axes carry the most weight for entity A versus entity B, and which differences are large enough to influence a real decision.
Practical use of the comparison: read the data above, then drill into the individual entity A and entity B detail pages for the underlying breakdown. A pairwise comparison answers the relative question; the per-entity pages answer the absolute question.
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.