Rochester, MN vs St. Paul, MN
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Summary
St. Paul spends 38.8% more per capita than Rochester ($8,756/person difference). Rochester, MN has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (A, 86/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Property Tax | $1,144 | $130 |
| Sales Tax | $1,029 | $1,463 |
| Income Tax | $0 | $27 |
| Intergovernmental | $120 | $6,526 |
| Charges & Fees | $1,283 | $2,727 |
| Other | $6,193 | $4,806 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Fire Protection | $445 | $503 |
| Public Welfare | $1,563 | $1,730 |
| Health | $673 | $663 |
| Hospitals | $0 | $3,391 |
| Parks & Recreation | $1,257 | $2,137 |
| Housing | $3,160 | $4,835 |
| Sewerage | $0 | $367 |
| Utilities | $957 | $2,294 |
| Interest on Debt | $971 | $0 |
| Other | $4,771 | $6,632 |
Compare More Cities
The side-by-side above pulls the the Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances data for both entity A and entity B. What follows is the interpretation — which specific axes carry the most weight for entity A versus entity B, and which differences are large enough to influence a real decision.
Practical use of the comparison: read the data above, then drill into the individual entity A and entity B detail pages for the underlying breakdown. A pairwise comparison answers the relative question; the per-entity pages answer the absolute question.
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.