Skip to main content
Data from U.S. Census Bureau · 2026 · Methodology
CitySpend

Renton, WA vs Kent, WA

Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)

Summary

Renton spends 60.8% more per capita than Kent ($6,377/person difference). Renton, WA has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (B, 75/100).

Fiscal Health Score

City A
Renton, WA
Pop. 105,355
B
75/100
Budget Balance52
Debt Burden100
Pension Funding76
Spending Efficiency80
Revenue Diversity100
Trend Direction50
City B
Kent, WA
Pop. 135,169
C
57/100
Budget Balance34
Debt Burden41
Pension Funding76
Spending Efficiency100
Revenue Diversity54
Trend Direction50

Key Metrics

Metric
Renton
Kent
Total Spending
$1.8B
$1.4B
Spending / Capita
$16,868
$10,491
Total Revenue
$2.4B
$1.4B
Revenue / Capita
$23,215
$10,134
Total Debt
$22.3M
$122.3M
Debt / Capita
$211
$905
Population
105,355
135,169
Gov Employees / 10K
0.0
0.0
Avg Gov Salary
$0
$0

Per Capita Spending by Department

Police
Renton$2,978
Kent$413
Fire Protection
Renton$753
Kent$292
Highways & Roads
Renton$90
Kent-$10
Parks & Recreation
Renton$1,288
Kent$1,448
Health
Renton$0
Kent$0

Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)

RentonKent
Property Tax
$31
$0
Sales Tax
$377
$272
Income Tax
$2,146
$89
Intergovernmental
$792
$1,884
Charges & Fees
$1,771
$1,797
Other
$4,728
$4,935

Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)

RentonKent
Police
$2,978
$413
Fire Protection
$753
$292
Highways & Roads
$90
-$10
Public Welfare
$1,270
$850
Health
$0
$0
Hospitals
$496
$207
Parks & Recreation
$1,288
$1,448
Housing
$3,801
$3,476
Sewerage
$39
$36
Utilities
$3,428
$1,474
Interest on Debt
$0
$1
Other
$2,725
$2,306
B
Renton, WA
Fiscal Health Score: 75/100
Good fiscal health
C
Kent, WA
Fiscal Health Score: 57/100
Average fiscal health

Compare More Cities