Reading, PA vs Scranton, PA
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Reading, PA spends 56% more per resident than Scranton, PA: $16,327 against $10,446. That gap is large enough to show up across most functional budget categories below.
Reading, PA edges Scranton, PA on the Fiscal Health Score by 3 points — 86/100 (grade A) to 83/100 (grade A). At a margin this narrow the grade is close enough that the factor-level detail matters more than the composite.
Scranton, PA reports no outstanding debt per resident in its Census filing, while Reading, PA carries $87 per resident. Their budgets diverge on where the largest per-resident dollars go: Reading, PA leads with parks and recreation at $826 per resident, while Scranton, PA leads with fire protection at $1,029.
They also fund themselves differently: other revenue is the largest single revenue source in Reading, PA at 28% of total revenue, whereas Scranton, PA relies most on income tax at 11%.
Summary
Reading spends 56.3% more per capita than Scranton ($5,881/person difference). Reading, PA has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (A, 86/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Property Tax | $47 | $28 |
| Sales Tax | $60 | $3 |
| Income Tax | $956 | $1,114 |
| Intergovernmental | $767 | $114 |
| Charges & Fees | $3,742 | $0 |
| Other | $6,157 | $47 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Fire Protection | $256 | $1,029 |
| Highways & Roads | $92 | $156 |
| Public Welfare | $1,502 | $115 |
| Health | $180 | $411 |
| Hospitals | $672 | $0 |
| Parks & Recreation | $826 | $130 |
| Housing | $4,415 | $3,373 |
| Utilities | $3,304 | $668 |
| Other | $5,080 | $4,564 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.