Raleigh, NC vs Los Angeles, CA
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Los Angeles, CA outspends Raleigh, NC by a wide margin per resident — $85,432 versus $13,911, a 514% difference. A gap this size usually reflects a structurally different service mix or accounting scope rather than a single line item.
Raleigh, NC holds the stronger Fiscal Health Score, 76/100 (grade B) against 47/100 (grade D) for Los Angeles, CA — a 29-point spread that puts the two in different grade territory.
Los Angeles, CA reports no outstanding debt per resident in its Census filing, while Raleigh, NC carries $906 per resident. Their budgets diverge on where the largest per-resident dollars go: Raleigh, NC leads with parks and recreation at $1,391 per resident, while Los Angeles, CA leads with police at $4,111.
They also fund themselves differently: intergovernmental transfers is the largest single revenue source in Raleigh, NC at 47% of total revenue, whereas Los Angeles, CA relies most on other revenue at 51%.
Summary
Los Angeles spends 83.7% more per capita than Raleigh ($71,522/person difference). Raleigh, NC has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (B, 76/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Property Tax | $0 | $64 |
| Sales Tax | $858 | $77 |
| Income Tax | $806 | $307 |
| Intergovernmental | $14,128 | $134 |
| Charges & Fees | $2,681 | $459 |
| Other | $4,740 | $9,048 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Police | $0 | $4,111 |
| Fire Protection | $277 | $1,057 |
| Highways & Roads | $448 | $503 |
| Education | $6 | $829 |
| Public Welfare | $498 | $1,286 |
| Health | $0 | $409 |
| Hospitals | $669 | $2,135 |
| Parks & Recreation | $1,391 | $1,347 |
| Housing | $2,712 | $6,325 |
| Sewerage | $281 | $34 |
| Utilities | $2,469 | $21,992 |
| Interest on Debt | $1,513 | $630 |
| General Admin | $0 | $11,586 |
| Other | $3,646 | $33,189 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.