Portland, OR vs Tulsa, OK
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Portland, OR outspends Tulsa, OK by a wide margin per resident — $23,675 versus $5,250, a 351% difference. A gap this size usually reflects a structurally different service mix or accounting scope rather than a single line item.
Portland, OR edges Tulsa, OK on the Fiscal Health Score by 7 points — 63/100 (grade C) to 56/100 (grade C). At a margin this narrow the grade is close enough that the factor-level detail matters more than the composite.
Tulsa, OK reports no outstanding debt per resident in its Census filing, while Portland, OR carries $1,574 per resident. Their budgets diverge on where the largest per-resident dollars go: Portland, OR leads with parks and recreation at $2,477 per resident, while Tulsa, OK leads with health at $762.
Summary
Portland spends 350.9% more per capita than Tulsa ($18,424/person difference). Portland, OR has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (C, 63/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Sales Tax | $1,695 | $97 |
| Income Tax | $130 | $0 |
| Intergovernmental | $8,979 | $0 |
| Charges & Fees | $3,883 | $0 |
| Other | $7,916 | $53 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Police | $0 | $628 |
| Fire Protection | $1,700 | $196 |
| Highways & Roads | $139 | $257 |
| Public Welfare | $3,607 | $86 |
| Health | $0 | $762 |
| Hospitals | $2,893 | $0 |
| Parks & Recreation | $2,477 | $154 |
| Housing | $3,694 | $350 |
| Sewerage | $630 | $27 |
| Utilities | $1,845 | $41 |
| Other | $6,689 | $2,748 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.