Plymouth, MN vs St. Paul, MN
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
St. Paul, MN outspends Plymouth, MN by a wide margin per resident — $22,552 versus $8,877, a 154% difference. A gap this size usually reflects a structurally different service mix or accounting scope rather than a single line item.
Plymouth, MN holds the stronger Fiscal Health Score, 69/100 (grade B) against 55/100 (grade C) for St. Paul, MN — a 14-point spread that puts the two in different grade territory.
On debt, Plymouth, MN carries the lighter load at $222 per resident versus $2,026 for St. Paul, MN. Both cities pour the most per-resident dollars into the same function: parks and recreation leads in Plymouth, MN at $1,549 per resident and in St. Paul, MN at $2,137.
On the revenue side both lean hardest on intergovernmental transfers — 100% of total revenue in Plymouth, MN and 18% in St. Paul, MN.
Summary
St. Paul spends 60.6% more per capita than Plymouth ($13,675/person difference). Plymouth, MN has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (B, 69/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Property Tax | $0 | $130 |
| Sales Tax | $613 | $1,463 |
| Income Tax | $149 | $27 |
| Intergovernmental | $7,979 | $6,526 |
| Charges & Fees | $1,754 | $2,727 |
| Other | $1,884 | $4,806 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Fire Protection | $311 | $503 |
| Public Welfare | $820 | $1,730 |
| Health | $0 | $663 |
| Hospitals | $345 | $3,391 |
| Parks & Recreation | $1,549 | $2,137 |
| Housing | $2,036 | $4,835 |
| Sewerage | $0 | $367 |
| Utilities | $904 | $2,294 |
| Interest on Debt | $631 | $0 |
| Other | $2,281 | $6,632 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.