Phoenix, AZ vs Bakersfield, CA
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Summary
Phoenix spends 36.4% more per capita than Bakersfield ($4,217/person difference). Phoenix, AZ has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (B, 67/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Property Tax | $7 | $1 |
| Sales Tax | $338 | $20 |
| Income Tax | $1,260 | $1,909 |
| Intergovernmental | $50,709 | $3,862 |
| Charges & Fees | $2,998 | $1,024 |
| Other | $2,038 | $1,915 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Fire Protection | $170 | $0 |
| Highways & Roads | $86 | $0 |
| Education | $214 | $0 |
| Public Welfare | $507 | $840 |
| Health | $258 | $0 |
| Hospitals | $1,521 | $425 |
| Parks & Recreation | $652 | $741 |
| Housing | $3,879 | $3,391 |
| Sewerage | $388 | $265 |
| Utilities | $2,480 | $2,679 |
| Interest on Debt | $1,760 | $0 |
| Other | $3,878 | $3,234 |
Compare More Cities
The side-by-side above pulls the the Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances data for both entity A and entity B. What follows is the interpretation — which specific axes carry the most weight for entity A versus entity B, and which differences are large enough to influence a real decision.
Practical use of the comparison: read the data above, then drill into the individual entity A and entity B detail pages for the underlying breakdown. A pairwise comparison answers the relative question; the per-entity pages answer the absolute question.
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.