Philadelphia, PA vs Reading, PA
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Philadelphia, PA outspends Reading, PA by a wide margin per resident — $56,272 versus $16,327, a 245% difference. A gap this size usually reflects a structurally different service mix or accounting scope rather than a single line item.
Reading, PA holds the stronger Fiscal Health Score, 86/100 (grade A) against 45/100 (grade D) for Philadelphia, PA — a 41-point spread that puts the two in different grade territory.
On debt, Reading, PA carries the lighter load at $87 per resident versus $1,069 for Philadelphia, PA. Their budgets diverge on where the largest per-resident dollars go: Philadelphia, PA leads with fire protection at $7,082 per resident, while Reading, PA leads with parks and recreation at $826.
They also fund themselves differently: intergovernmental transfers is the largest single revenue source in Philadelphia, PA at 16% of total revenue, whereas Reading, PA relies most on other revenue at 28%.
Summary
Philadelphia spends 244.6% more per capita than Reading ($39,945/person difference). Reading, PA has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (A, 86/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Property Tax | $0 | $47 |
| Sales Tax | $107 | $60 |
| Income Tax | $8 | $956 |
| Intergovernmental | $6,288 | $767 |
| Charges & Fees | $2,790 | $3,742 |
| Other | $4,029 | $6,157 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Police | $1,505 | $0 |
| Fire Protection | $7,082 | $256 |
| Highways & Roads | $1,215 | $92 |
| Public Welfare | $1,456 | $1,502 |
| Health | $229 | $180 |
| Hospitals | $4,048 | $672 |
| Parks & Recreation | $593 | $826 |
| Housing | $4,902 | $4,415 |
| Sewerage | $325 | $0 |
| Utilities | $4,222 | $3,304 |
| Interest on Debt | $3 | $0 |
| Other | $30,692 | $5,080 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.