Philadelphia, PA vs Minneapolis, MN
Side-by-side fiscal comparison · U.S. Census Bureau data (2023)
Philadelphia, PA outspends Minneapolis, MN by a wide margin per resident — $56,272 versus $21,910, a 157% difference. A gap this size usually reflects a structurally different service mix or accounting scope rather than a single line item.
Minneapolis, MN holds the stronger Fiscal Health Score, 65/100 (grade B) against 45/100 (grade D) for Philadelphia, PA — a 20-point spread that puts the two in different grade territory.
On debt, Minneapolis, MN carries the lighter load at $644 per resident versus $1,069 for Philadelphia, PA. Their budgets diverge on where the largest per-resident dollars go: Philadelphia, PA leads with fire protection at $7,082 per resident, while Minneapolis, MN leads with parks and recreation at $3,486.
They also fund themselves differently: intergovernmental transfers is the largest single revenue source in Philadelphia, PA at 16% of total revenue, whereas Minneapolis, MN relies most on other revenue at 17%.
Summary
Philadelphia spends 156.8% more per capita than Minneapolis ($34,362/person difference). Minneapolis, MN has the stronger Fiscal Health Score (B, 65/100).
Fiscal Health Score
Key Metrics
Per Capita Spending by Department
Revenue Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Sales Tax | $107 | $1,989 |
| Income Tax | $8 | $994 |
| Intergovernmental | $6,288 | $2,929 |
| Charges & Fees | $2,790 | $2,040 |
| Other | $4,029 | $3,254 |
Spending Breakdown (Per Capita)
| Police | $1,505 | $0 |
| Fire Protection | $7,082 | $683 |
| Highways & Roads | $1,215 | $221 |
| Public Welfare | $1,456 | $1,500 |
| Health | $229 | $0 |
| Hospitals | $4,048 | $0 |
| Parks & Recreation | $593 | $3,486 |
| Housing | $4,902 | $4,133 |
| Sewerage | $325 | $570 |
| Utilities | $4,222 | $2,398 |
| Interest on Debt | $3 | $0 |
| Other | $30,692 | $8,919 |
Compare More Cities
Source: Census Annual Survey of State and Local Government Finances, 2026.